MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE - PROTECT THE DIGNITY AND HONOUR OF JUDICIARY

A State Bank of Hyderabad Official has filed false affidavits under oath in Andhra Pradesh (Hyderabad) and Delhi High Courts to misguide and derail the administration of justice and both courts overlooked/unnoticed and ignored his misdemeanour. He has shown his age also 9 years lower in his affidavits and later on it was discovered that he had tampered his age to overcome the upper age limit fixed for joining the bank service.

He has obtained STAYS from both High Courts in the same matter and both STAYS remained simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country. It is very strange as to how A.P. High Court has granted the STAY when it has no jurisdiction over a Decree issued by a lower court i.e. Tis Hazari in Delhi and legal pundits baffled about this.
Finally, when his mischief has been brought to the notice of Delhi High Court, he made a sudden dramatic U-turn and sought for a compromise. The case has been decided in favour of the aggrieved as per the terms insisted by the Opposite Party.
No punitive action has been taken against the Opposite Party for making attempts to sabotage, subvert and thwart the process of justice and for wasting the precious time of High Courts which were already burdened with lakhs of cases for disposal. Moreover, Delhi High Court did not compensate the legal expenses incurred in various courts and not even the court fee paid. The aggrieved with his fragile health had to shuttle between Delhi and Hyderabad incurring huge expenses.

Adding an insult to the injury already inflicted, Delhi High Court has ordered the victim to go to Hyderabad who is a resident of Delhi to collect a part of the decreed amount deposited by the party and the balance was ordered to be paid in Delhi. There the aggrieved had to face many problems due to rampant corruption and could get his cheque only after his travails had been reported by a prominent Telugu Daily Newspaper "VAARTHA" and after receiving scoldings by the aggrieved from the Chief Judge, City Civil Courts who was in a rage for rushing to the Press.

QUOTING THE EXAMPLES OF ZAHIRA SHEIK OF THE INFAMOUS BEST BAKERY CARNAGE OF GUJARAT WHERE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HAS PUNISHED HER FOR PERJURY BY IMPOSING HEFTY PENALTY BESIDES ONE YEAR IMPRISONMENT AND A RAJASTHAN MINISTER INDICTED BY SAVOY MADHOPUR COURT FOR FILING FALSE AFFIDAVITS, THE AGGRIEVED HAS FILED A SLP CC No.194/2007 AS A PETITIONER-IN-PERSON, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. HOWEVER, THE CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED CITING REASONS OF DELAY AND COMPROMISE (Court No.6 on 25-01-07). THE PETITIONER WAS SHELL-SHOCKED AS TO WHY THIS CASE HAS BEEN TREATED DIFFERENTLY.

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT IS UNJUST AS IT SENDS WRONG SIGNALS TO THE PEOPLE TO HOODWINK THE JUDICIARY WITH IMPUNITY IF NO STRICT ACTION IS TAKEN AGAINST SUCH OFFENDERS. THE SUPREME COURT COULD NOT GAUZE THE ENORMITY OF THE CRIME COMMITTED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTY IN THE PRESENT CASE.

THE AGGRIEVED IS A SENIOR CITIZEN WITH NO PENSION AND MEDICAL FACILITY. THE AGGRIEVED HAS SLIPPED INTO EXTREME DEPRESSION WITH THE ILLOGICAL/IRRATIONAL VERDICT OF DELHI HIGH COURT AND SUFFERED MASSIVE HEART ATTACK AND UNDERWENT SURGERY. SUPREME COURT WAS PRAYED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY AND IT WAS CLEARLY STATED IN HIS PETITION THAT NO OTHER MONETARY RELIEF WAS SOUGHT FROM THE APEX COURT BUT ONLY PRAYED FOR UPHOLDING THE DIGNITY AND HONOUR OF JUDICIARY IN THE COUNTRY. YET, THE SUPREME COURT HAS DISMISSED THE APPLICATION.

IT IS A DANGEROUS TREND TO FILE SWORN FALSE AFFIDAVITS IN HIGH COURTS AND NO LENIENCE TO BE SHOWN IN SUCH CASES. IF THE JUDICIARY CAN'T SAFEGUARD ITS OWN PRESTIGE, WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE SACRED JUDICIARY IN THIS COUNTRY?