asif qabil [Signature #79]</h1> <article> <h1>asif qabil [Signature #79]</h1> <p>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 04:25:43 UTC</p> asif qabil </article> <article> <h1>Richard Cartwright [Signature #78]</h1> <p>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:21:11 UTC</p> Richard Cartwright, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear<p>Bring back Telewest.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr. Christopher Jackson [Signature #77]</h1> <p>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:26:34 UTC</p> Mr. Christopher Jackson, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Miss Susan Farndell [Signature #76]</h1> <p>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:06:20 UTC</p> Miss Susan Farndell, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr T Charalambous [Signature #75]</h1> <p>Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:41:28 UTC</p> Mr T Charalambous, United Kingdom<p>Sky tried to screw Virgin & Virgin decides to screw their customers. I live in a building which does not allow satellite dishes, so I dont have much choice in the matter. Freeview is fairly pointless & because there are no BT lines into the building either, Im double screwed because there is no ADSL available to replace Cable Internet - another service VM are about to screw us with AGAIN by capping speeds (Another petition methinks). Sir Richard Branson, I respected you greatly... not any more</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Fiona Reeve [Signature #74]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 May 2007 12:14:01 UTC</p> Mrs Fiona Reeve<p>I would be happy for my bill to increase if it meant keeping Sky One and Sky News. No warning was given.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Dave Dilley [Signature #73]</h1> <p>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:24:49 UTC</p> Mr Dave Dilley, LETCHWORTH Garden City<p>Taken off the channels I watched, replaced with channels I don't want. that is nothing like<br /> "Fairplay" The total lack of information on the Virgin Media site of any update on the dispute reminded me of the reported habits of the ostrich. As "valued subscribers" do we not have a right to the current state of the situation ? It is this total lack of regard and arrogance that was the last straw leading to my inquiries into a SKY transfer.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Michael Daily [Signature #72]</h1> <p>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:25:04 UTC</p> Mr Michael Daily, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, United Kingdom<p>I agree with thecomments made above</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr John Duncan [Signature #71]</h1> <p>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:48:29 UTC</p> Mr John Duncan, Livingston, West Lothian, United Kingdom<p>I prefer Sky News to BBC News24</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Marion Morris [Signature #70]</h1> <p>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:37:50 UTC</p> Mrs Marion Morris, Bolton, Lancashire, United Kingdom<p>Ask your customers what they want. It really is all about the animosity between Mr. Murdoch and yourself with us in between. I do hope that you are successful in this and that we will get ALL the channels back and peace will be restored to all of your customers</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Mandy Wood-Bradley [Signature #69]</h1> <p>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:23:17 UTC</p> Mrs Mandy Wood-Bradley </article> <article> <h1>Dr John Roughan [Signature #68]</h1> <p>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:53:39 UTC</p> Dr John Roughan<p>I joined Telewest at exactly the same time as the switchover, so do not feel it appropriate that I am tied-in to Virgin media for a year. Unless this is changed, I will be moving to sky immediately upon the end of my current contract</p> </article> <article> <h1>edward davies [Signature #67]</h1> <p>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:44:16 UTC</p> edward davies </article> <article> <h1>miss sam lord [Signature #66]</h1> <p>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:26:57 UTC</p> miss sam lord </article> <article> <h1>mr mike langley [Signature #65]</h1> <p>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:26:34 UTC</p> mr mike langley </article> <article> <h1>Philip Nichols [Signature #64]</h1> <p>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:48:34 UTC</p> Philip Nichols, Flitwick, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr geoffrey moore [Signature #63]</h1> <p>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:43:19 UTC</p> mr geoffrey moore </article> <article> <h1>mr lewis bradley [Signature #62]</h1> <p>Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:28:00 UTC</p> mr lewis bradley<p>i want sky sports news back but my parents say sky r ripping us off</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Garry Hutton [Signature #61]</h1> <p>Sat, 7 Apr 2007 05:50:18 UTC</p> Mr Garry Hutton, East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, United Kingdom<p>Pay the extra 3p per day and get the Sky Channels back A.S.A.P.</p> </article> <article> <h1>depvuaqng lanpdyi yndoivmfq ikhulmdpv yndoivmfq ikhulmdpv [Signature #60]</h1> <p>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:57:19 UTC</p> depvuaqng lanpdyi yndoivmfq ikhulmdpv yndoivmfq ikhulmdpv, depvuaqng lanpdyi, CA<p>jhitsopwe wocgfpk zvjpfb loajp afpq mlzp ntzq</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Simon Gould [Signature #59]</h1> <p>Wed, 4 Apr 2007 03:13:52 UTC</p> Mr Simon Gould, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr steven bradley [Signature #58]</h1> <p>Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:28:08 UTC</p> mr steven bradley<p>it seems that sky are monopolising tv rights so everyone has to pay to watch. Prices are going up all the time and its dimply not fair to those that cant afford it.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #57]</h1> <p>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:37:22 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>I was with SKY for about 18 months and found the service to be full of repeats and bad content and decided to move to NTL now Virgin Media.</p> <p>Sky won't get my business back - ever.</p> <p>Especially after this underhand move.</p> </article> <article> <h1>ms claire rose [Signature #56]</h1> <p>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:49:43 UTC</p> ms claire rose, west yorkshire, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Get ProperSky [Signature #55]</h1> <p>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:47:14 UTC</p> Mr Get ProperSky<p>Dude, stop whinging and cough up the extra few quid a week to get proper Sky. If you can't get proper Sky where you live, move. Virgin Media and related companies are for poor people who live in tenements and couldn't comprehend giving their magical 'picture box' more than the handful of crap channels that cable allows. Ciao.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Nisarg Mehta [Signature #54]</h1> <p>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:54:55 UTC</p> Mr Nisarg Mehta<p>I absolutely hate virgin media. Everything used to be perfect before "virgin" intervened.</p> <p>It took away the best ever channel "sky one". I cannot even watch good cricket games (i.e. India vs Sri Lanka) because virgin media dont offer the interactive service wheras I would get this service as a sky customer.</p> <p>I would not recommend virgin media to others because VIRGIN MEDIA TRULY SUCKS!</p> <p>ps/ virgin central is no replacement for sky one. I once again feel the need to say that VIRGIN=RUBBISH</p> </article> <article> <h1>Dr William Colledge [Signature #53]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:08:49 UTC</p> Dr William Colledge </article> <article> <h1>Mr Robert Elliott [Signature #52]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:49:50 UTC</p> Mr Robert Elliott, Belfast, Co Antrim, United Kingdom<p>GIVE ME BACK MY SKY ONE!!! I didn't ask you to remove it, or Stand up for me, i didn't consent for you to act on my behalf, and your T&C's don't mention anything about my consent being used for anything else. So bring back whats been taken, else i'll be going to Sky.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Rebecca Hale [Signature #51]</h1> <p>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:27:27 UTC</p> Miss Rebecca Hale, Wednesbury, West Midlands, United Kingdom<p>I have endless other problems that need attention also on top of losing these channels.</p> </article> <article> <h1>MS Anonymous [Signature #50]</h1> <p>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:15:41 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>colene houghton [Signature #49]</h1> <p>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:42:45 UTC</p> colene houghton, sheffield, south yorkshire, United Kingdom<p>sky are just greedy will not be moving there!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Sue Burt [Signature #48]</h1> <p>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:40:07 UTC</p> Sue Burt, STEVENAGE, HERTS, United Kingdom<p>I AM INCENSED BY THIS ACTION. I ENJOY LOST AND OTHER SERIES SUCH AS STAR TREK AND BATTLESTAR GALLATICA ENORMOUSLY. I AM NOT PREPARD TO PAY £15 MONTH FOR THEM HOWEVER. SKY ALREADY HAVE THE SPORTS CHANNELS ETC. IT IS JUST PROFITEERING AGAIN BY ANOTHER GREEDY COMPANY THAT<br /> PUTS PROFIT BEFORE CUSTOMER. I HOPE THEY LOSE CUSTOMERS OVER THIS. SERVES THEM RIGHT!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #47]</h1> <p>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:51:34 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr John McDermott [Signature #46]</h1> <p>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:19:06 UTC</p> Mr John McDermott </article> <article> <h1>Mr Darren Hughes [Signature #45]</h1> <p>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:06:38 UTC</p> Mr Darren Hughes, Wigan, United Kingdom<p>The only programs im interested in where Sky one and sky sports news....<br /> Even the package offered by sky for phone, Broadband, and TV will be cheaper than currently paying !!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Victoria Morris [Signature #44]</h1> <p>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:21:09 UTC</p> Mrs Victoria Morris </article> <article> <h1>ben nudd [Signature #43]</h1> <p>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:43:23 UTC</p> ben nudd </article> <article> <h1>mr andy docherty [Signature #42]</h1> <p>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 05:18:46 UTC</p> mr andy docherty </article> <article> <h1>mr Peter Reime [Signature #41]</h1> <p>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:15:36 UTC</p> mr Peter Reime, Brighton, United Kingdom<p>why not offer the sky package as a premium add on like sky movies? Gives the customer the choice and everybody is happy.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Debbie Enticknapp [Signature #40]</h1> <p>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 06:42:28 UTC</p> Mrs Debbie Enticknapp<p>I WOULD GO RATHER GO WITHOUT THAN GO TO SKY BECAUSE THEY ARE GETTING TO BIG FOR THEIR BOOTS</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Richard Denston [Signature #39]</h1> <p>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 04:53:32 UTC</p> Mr Richard Denston<p>You say Sky have picked up the ball. It sounds like Virgin are the childish one's here. Get it sorted.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #38]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:31:33 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>This constitutes a breach of contract. A contract I signed on the basis of being promised an exacting list of basic channels, one of the biggest of which was Sky One. This hosts two of my favorite programmes 24 and the Simpsons. I am currently in limbo after watching the first 6 episodes of the new series of 24 before the switch off. Branson please sort this out or your new firm will be the market looser!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #37]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:51:41 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>Its stupid, I mean how can they just take away the Simpsons? This Virgin Central thing, it shows re-runs from the past 10 years or the latest casualty from the bbc, why? This is not compensation for sky 1!!! Wake Up VM!!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #36]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:28:08 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>miss samantha taylor [Signature #35]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 Mar 2007 03:09:44 UTC</p> miss samantha taylor, stanford le hope, essex, United Kingdom<p>i think it rediculase that sky has done this on perpase. they took lost from chancle 4 (afree chanle) then took sky from vergin media. all get more money in there pockets, they know so many people will drop virgine media just so they can have the chance to watch lost. im outraged by this as i love lost but refuse to be victime to sky tv.</p> </article> <article> <h1>miss Maureen O'Neill [Signature #34]</h1> <p>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:02:27 UTC</p> miss Maureen O'Neill, Motherwell, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Alan Hood [Signature #33]</h1> <p>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:44:02 UTC</p> Mr Alan Hood<p>Really hope that sky and virgin-media can still come to some sort of agreement as are both wealthy companies and it is the everyday customer who is losing out the most. If an agreement is not reached soon that will have to seriously consider cancelling my virgin-media subscription.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr David Cawdeary [Signature #32]</h1> <p>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:29:57 UTC</p> Mr David Cawdeary, Portsmouth, United Kingdom<p>The only reason we have chosen NTL (prior to virgin media) is the keen pricing on broadband, no need for sky dish and the fact that Lost is now broadcast on Sky One and is my favourite programme on TV. I demand that Sky One and other basic Sky channels are returned asap, as my current service is barely better than freeview.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Steven Morris [Signature #31]</h1> <p>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:00:54 UTC</p> Mr Steven Morris </article> <article> <h1>oqdtjfgbh axersftk pwtbmdcvx maykrx pwtbmdcvx maykrx [Signature #30]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:12:58 UTC</p> oqdtjfgbh axersftk pwtbmdcvx maykrx pwtbmdcvx maykrx, oqdtjfgbh axersftk, CA<p>gmjpna unjcswl resixhzlk tawou nhre waoi nlsomv</p> </article> <article> <h1>mr peter betton [Signature #29]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:18:08 UTC</p> mr peter betton, kidderminster, worcs, United Kingdom<p>less channels shouldnt we be offered a lower price for this?</p> </article> <article> <h1>Annette Leonhard [Signature #28]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:17:55 UTC</p> Annette Leonhard, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ashley James [Signature #27]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:06:45 UTC</p> Ashley James, West Midlands, England, United Kingdom<p>If we don't get Sky One then they should drop the price or give us something new!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #26]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:53:43 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>mr Ian Collins [Signature #25]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:20:53 UTC</p> mr Ian Collins<p>Tried to get through to VM to discuss, gave up after 20 attempts</p> </article> <article> <h1>mr Clinton Harding [Signature #24]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:20:00 UTC</p> mr Clinton Harding, benson, oxfordshire, United Kingdom<p>I think this action is very bad and i am not happy i set up a contract with yourself with sky channels included now they are not there you have broken this contract.<br /> I bet you will not even read this e-mail the bigger the company the smaller the customer is</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Lorraine Bagnall [Signature #23]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:13:47 UTC</p> Ms Lorraine Bagnall </article> <article> <h1>Miss Ruth Masters [Signature #22]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:57:54 UTC</p> Miss Ruth Masters </article> <article> <h1>Mr Richard Shaw [Signature #21]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:47:26 UTC</p> Mr Richard Shaw, United Kingdom<p>If Sky One doesnt f***ing go back on show on ntl:vigin by the end of march everyone should go over to sky, the best!!!!!!!<br /> Or sky one should go on top-up tv so we can watch our favourite shows like the simpsons and lost.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mt Tony Tofts [Signature #20]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:40:18 UTC</p> Mt Tony Tofts </article> <article> <h1>Matthew Lacey [Signature #19]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:22:30 UTC</p> Matthew Lacey </article> <article> <h1>Mr Timothy Ratcliffe [Signature #18]</h1> <p>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:16:11 UTC</p> Mr Timothy Ratcliffe, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom<p>The only reason I opted for NTL was because in comparison with Freeview, it offered Sky One and Sky News. Now these are not available, your service is completely useless to me as those were the only channels I used.</p> <p>I am deeply disappointed with your management of this situation, and would not recommend your services to anyone.</p> </article> <article> <h1>mr roy clayton [Signature #17]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:49:56 UTC</p> mr roy clayton, derby, United Kingdom<p>I can no longer watch my favourite shows so how can Virgin Media convince me to stay with them and not move to Sky which would probably work out cheaper overall anyway???</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Peter Bonnar [Signature #16]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:25:05 UTC</p> Mr Peter Bonnar, Ruislip, Middlesex, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Miss Sarah Christie [Signature #15]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:42:01 UTC</p> Miss Sarah Christie<p>Virgin, you suck! Sky1 MUST be one of your most popular channels, if not THE most popular! Hurry up and get it sorted, and make sure when you do you repeat all the episodes of popular shows that we've missed - Bones, Lost, etc. If not you stand to lose more customers than dropping Sky was worth.</p> </article> <article> <h1>mrs Cheryl Lindell [Signature #14]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:23:24 UTC</p> mrs Cheryl Lindell, Bristol, United Kingdom<p>Most favourite programmes were on sky one. Especially cross at losing 24 and lost half way through!!! This seems to have been done with no thought to viewers!!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>miss Anonymous [Signature #13]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:22:59 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>i want lost back</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Dan Walker [Signature #12]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:16:41 UTC</p> Mr Dan Walker, United Kingdom<p>How dare you take Sky channels without consent of customers, I'm disgusted and will be switching to a better service that is more in touch with it's customers a.s.a.p along with all my friends and family.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr COLIN SIVAS [Signature #11]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 01:10:57 UTC</p> Mr COLIN SIVAS, ILFORD, United Kingdom<p>Nobody should pay Virgin's bills until they return the basic channels customers subscribed to. What they have done is barely legal.</p> </article> <article> <h1>mr arthur gold [Signature #10]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:16:26 UTC</p> mr arthur gold, liverpool, merseyside, United Kingdom<p>Although I am reluctant to move to Sky, because they are undoubtedly bullies I am seriously considering doing so. For me Sky One is the main attraction, due to it's excellent American imports. It's all very well Virgin saying that Sky have taken their ball, but it's us, the paying audience who are paying the same subscription fees for a lesser service.</p> </article> <article> <h1>ms. kate elmore [Signature #9]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:22:03 UTC</p> ms. kate elmore, birmingham, uk, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Antony Sowter [Signature #8]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 06:31:47 UTC</p> Mr Antony Sowter, DERBY, DERBYSHIRE, United Kingdom<p>you have two weeks to sort it out or we move to sky</p> </article> <article> <h1>mr terry henstock [Signature #7]</h1> <p>Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:46:15 UTC</p> mr terry henstock, barking, essex, United Kingdom<p>planning on canceling my broadband phone tv<br /> services with virgin absolutely disgracefull</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Robin Press [Signature #6]</h1> <p>Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:32:49 UTC</p> Mr Robin Press<p>you and your company are a disgrace</p> </article> <article> <h1>Isabella Betkowski [Signature #5]</h1> <p>Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:14:19 UTC</p> Isabella Betkowski </article> <article> <h1>Mr Benjamin Fry [Signature #4]</h1> <p>Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:31:04 UTC</p> Mr Benjamin Fry, The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands </article> <article> <h1>Miss Kayleigh Samuel [Signature #3]</h1> <p>Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:23:55 UTC</p> Miss Kayleigh Samuel, cardiff, south glamorgan, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Jonathan Elting [Signature #2]</h1> <p>Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:41:21 UTC</p> Jonathan Elting, Bath, United Kingdom<p>If we lose the sky channels, why don't we get a reduction in our monthly bill? You've reduced the service and therefore I think its every customer's right to pay less!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #1]</h1> <p>Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:36:49 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> </main></body></html>