Support Dogs NSW Members' exemption from Breeder Licensing Scheme Petition: Signature List Feed

Ms Mary Barber [Signature #452]

Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:46:39 UTC

Ms Mary Barber, Glendon, NSW, Australia

Please do squeeze out ethical small dog breeders who because of their size are able to give their breeding dogs enriched lives as family pets. They are the opposite to puppy farmers. The pups produced by Dogs NSW registered small breeders are often given the best start in life with ENS, sound desensitising and behaviour imprinting.

Mr. Manu S-M [Signature #451]

Tue, 1 Oct 2019 02:29:15 UTC

Mr. Manu S-M, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Ivan Nikanorov [Signature #450]

Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:55:47 UTC

Ivan Nikanorov, Russia

Ms Anonymous [Signature #449]

Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:37:46 UTC

Anonymous, Woolooware, NSW, Australia

Pamela Gauci [Signature #448]

Fri, 31 May 2013 05:26:44 UTC

Pamela Gauci, coffs harbour, nsw, Australia

answer to control "backyard breeders.. make them "chip" desex all puppies/kittens an vaccinate, before sale OR MAKE PET SHOPS DO IT BEFORE SELLING. No one can sell if they do not have a registered number with Dogs Nsw [pedigree breeder]or the Council [if non pedigree breeder]

Dr Bruce Robertson [Signature #447]

Thu, 30 May 2013 09:01:23 UTC

Dr Bruce Robertson, Mid Dural, NSW, Australia

There is no real justification for establishing a government imposed breeder licensing scheme in NSW, as long as those measures already in place intended to identify all domestic canines by microchip and enforce their registration at the domiciliary local authority, are not being fully enforced. While apparently in the minority, those puppies produced under optimal rearing conditions by members of Dogs NSW are already fully monitored and supervised, and there is no reason to subject those responsible owner/breeders to a second level of regulation.
Dogs NSW already does a good job setting breeder standards, and if anything, new regulatory measures should strengthen their ability to do that. Leading by example to one's peers sharing a common interest is always going to be much more effective than superfluous regulation, especially if wielded from outside. No responsible Dogs NSW member would want to see those policing functions carried out by poorly-educated officers employed by the RSPCA for example, judging by its past PF48record!

Mrs Paulette Finlayson [Signature #446]

Sun, 26 May 2013 09:53:58 UTC

Mrs Paulette Finlayson, NSW, Australia

Mr & Mrs David & Robyn Scott [Signature #445]

Sun, 26 May 2013 09:39:21 UTC

Mr & Mrs David & Robyn Scott, Australia

Ms Beverley Roberts [Signature #444]

Fri, 24 May 2013 08:23:27 UTC

Ms Beverley Roberts, Australia

Mrs Frances Mason [Signature #443]

Fri, 24 May 2013 04:45:10 UTC

Mrs Frances Mason, Lithgow, NSW, Australia

Mrs Eileen McGregor [Signature #442]

Fri, 24 May 2013 03:29:37 UTC

Mrs Eileen McGregor, Douglas Park, NSW, Australia

Derele Job [Signature #441]

Fri, 24 May 2013 03:28:55 UTC

Derele Job, NSW, Australia

DOGS NSW SHOULD REMAIN IN POWER and the added breeders licencing scheme is unnecessary and uncalled for. Dogs NSW does wonderful work, why change good work........................?

Mr Peter Thornhill [Signature #440]

Fri, 24 May 2013 03:22:42 UTC

Mr Peter Thornhill, NSW, Australia

Change is not needed when the job is being done well now! Keep Dogs NSW the way it is with its own control, otherwise I fear more cull will ensue!

Mrs Margaret Burnside [Signature #439]

Thu, 16 May 2013 06:15:38 UTC

Mrs Margaret Burnside, Gawler, South Australia, Australia

jennifer skinner [Signature #438]

Wed, 15 May 2013 08:41:24 UTC

jennifer skinner, Australia

It is NOT Dogs NSW members causing the over population of dogs, but the UNREGISTERED, backyard breeder. You only need to check on Trading post, Gumtree etc to see how many puppies are bred & sold WITHOUT registration, compared to those that are. Most registered breeders advertise on dogzonline.com.au & the comparison of difference can be easily observed. Use your eyes & your brain & do the research. How about COMPULSORY desexing of ALL dogs which are not owned by members of Dogs NSW, or other recognised organisations. If you punish us, most will just join the ranks of the unregistered breeder, of which you somehow don't give a toss that they exist.

Ms Pamela Louie [Signature #437]

Tue, 14 May 2013 02:33:02 UTC

Ms Pamela Louie, Australia

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #436]

Sun, 12 May 2013 09:13:37 UTC

Anonymous, Australia

Mr William Allen [Signature #435]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:03:03 UTC

Mr William Allen, Werribee, Victoria, Canada

Ron Bryant [Signature #434]

Sat, 11 May 2013 08:13:15 UTC

Ron Bryant, WA, Australia

Mrs Michelle Bryant [Signature #433]

Sat, 11 May 2013 07:21:33 UTC

Mrs Michelle Bryant, Australia

Ms Kerri Timms [Signature #432]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:54:18 UTC

Ms Kerri Timms, Australia

Miss Cotrina Preston [Signature #431]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:51:40 UTC

Miss Cotrina Preston, Australia

Ms Marilyn Roberts [Signature #430]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:49:58 UTC

Ms Marilyn Roberts, MT COLAH, NSW, Australia

Ms Allison Wright [Signature #429]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:42:25 UTC

Ms Allison Wright, NSW, Australia

I would prefer to see all back yard breeders and puppy mills be brought under control before responsible and ethical breeders, the likes of which you will find in Dogs NSW members.

Ms Danielle Atkin [Signature #428]

Sat, 11 May 2013 06:13:30 UTC

Ms Danielle Atkin, Australia

Leave the Dogs NSW and ANKC breeders alone. Not everyone wants a rescue dog, and we trust in registered, ethical Dogs NSW breeders. Who was it that started the hip and Elbow Xray scheme? Registered breeders thats who.. All screening tests undertaken now were a effort on the part of each purebred dog club to ensure we have healthy dogs. RSPCA wont even screen for basic e. coli infection, which incidentally cost my mother HUNDREDS of dollars to treat in her newly adopted dogs. RSPCA, NO WAY!! Give me a registered breeder ANYDAY..

Ms Ethel Blair [Signature #427]

Fri, 10 May 2013 05:46:45 UTC

Ms Ethel Blair, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Groups like Dogs NSW already have established systems that require their members to microchip, pay fees and work to a code of ethics. State Government needs to work more closely with these groups to ensure that fees and systems are not doubling up and are addressing the right issues. About 80% of dogs bred in Australia are by people who belong to no breed club/organisation. There is always a breeder / seller and buyer of an animal. Buyers also contribute to these problems, eg there would be a significant number of buyers of animals who just want a cheap animal and they don't care about micro chipping or vaccinations - they just want cheap. Some of these controls should be targeted at the buyers of animals because unethical breeders just respond to what some buyers want, ie the market. I suspect there would be a more effective way to implement a system where the encumbrance of compliance is not entirely placed on the breeder, and that it also puts some encumbrance on the buyers as well. I also think this proposed system could be easily rorted, and that checking compliance is very difficult.

Ms Pamela Hoole [Signature #426]

Fri, 10 May 2013 12:50:07 UTC

Ms Pamela Hoole, NSW, Australia

MrsVal Valerie Marston [Signature #425]

Thu, 9 May 2013 08:20:33 UTC

MrsVal Valerie Marston, QLD, Australia

Mrs Barbara JOSEPH [Signature #424]

Thu, 9 May 2013 07:54:48 UTC

Mrs Barbara JOSEPH, South Australia, Australia

mrs Simone Doyle [Signature #423]

Thu, 9 May 2013 04:36:31 UTC

mrs Simone Doyle, Lake Illawarra, New South Wales, Australia

Mr Tithen Ara [Signature #422]

Wed, 8 May 2013 09:15:23 UTC

Mr Tithen Ara, NSW, Australia

Mr Nathaneal Ara [Signature #421]

Wed, 8 May 2013 09:12:03 UTC

Mr Nathaneal Ara, Blackett, NSW, Australia

Mrs Lyn Mellett [Signature #420]

Wed, 8 May 2013 08:46:25 UTC

Mrs Lyn Mellett, Cheltenham, SA, Australia

Ms Lynette Niemann [Signature #419]

Wed, 8 May 2013 06:57:10 UTC

Ms Lynette Niemann, Australia

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #418]

Wed, 8 May 2013 06:13:43 UTC

Anonymous, Bluewater, Qld, Australia

Ms Susan Packer [Signature #417]

Wed, 8 May 2013 05:55:24 UTC

Ms Susan Packer, Australia

Members of controlling bodies of the ANKC are already regulated with regards to dog breeding activities and should not be included in the Breeder Licensing Scheme.

Mr John Bower [Signature #416]

Tue, 7 May 2013 10:40:54 UTC

Mr John Bower, Holmesville, NSW, Australia

Mr Robert Yarroll [Signature #415]

Tue, 7 May 2013 09:12:52 UTC

Mr Robert Yarroll, Australia

Miss Faye Yarroll [Signature #414]

Tue, 7 May 2013 09:11:52 UTC

Miss Faye Yarroll, Australia

Mr GREGORY BRIAN [Signature #413]

Tue, 7 May 2013 08:51:34 UTC

Mr GREGORY BRIAN, NORTH STRATHFIELD, NSW, Australia

Ms Sandra Henderson [Signature #412]

Tue, 7 May 2013 08:36:02 UTC

Ms Sandra Henderson, Australia

Miss Talia Kelly [Signature #411]

Tue, 7 May 2013 05:15:41 UTC

Miss Talia Kelly, Holmesvilee, NSW, Australia

Mr John Bower [Signature #410]

Tue, 7 May 2013 04:01:03 UTC

Mr John Bower, Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia

Mrs Shelley Kelly [Signature #409]

Tue, 7 May 2013 03:58:29 UTC

Mrs Shelley Kelly, Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia

Ms Susan Rose [Signature #408]

Mon, 6 May 2013 09:52:53 UTC

Ms Susan Rose, Australia

Please allow our hobby to continue.

Mr Stephen Lewis [Signature #407]

Mon, 6 May 2013 09:18:40 UTC

Mr Stephen Lewis, NSW, Australia

Mrs Arida Elizabeth Healy [Signature #406]

Mon, 6 May 2013 04:39:20 UTC

Mrs Arida Elizabeth Healy, Leycester, NSW, Australia

Mr Liam Patrick Healy [Signature #405]

Mon, 6 May 2013 04:36:24 UTC

Mr Liam Patrick Healy, Leycester, NSW, Australia

Miss Lauren Zumbo [Signature #404]

Mon, 6 May 2013 07:40:28 UTC

Miss Lauren Zumbo, Australia

Mr Giuseppe Zumbo [Signature #403]

Mon, 6 May 2013 07:38:33 UTC

Mr Giuseppe Zumbo, Australia

Ms Regina Tkacz [Signature #402]

Mon, 6 May 2013 06:51:38 UTC

Ms Regina Tkacz, Australia

Mr Peter Butterfield [Signature #401]

Mon, 6 May 2013 12:08:10 UTC

Mr Peter Butterfield, NSW, Australia

Dogs do it. Cats do it. Even birds and bees do it. Introducing a raft of expensive regulation that penalises 99.99% of responsible breeders is not going to fix the core problem. It will only make matters worse. Breeders in NSW already comply with a perfectly good system that provides registration, accountability, promotes best practices, protects consumers; that works and has stood the test of time. Punishing small breeders with additional fees to achieve the same results will only stop them from pursuing their passion and placing healthy animals into responsible homes, leaving large-scale breeders to fill the gap with poorer-quality stock. Precisely what is trying to be avoided.

This is another case of bureaucracy intervening in self-regulated industry without fully understanding the implications or costs of what they propose. Where is the business case here? What is the evidence proving greater efficiencies or improved outcomes will be achieved? There are more cheaper and effective ways to attain the goals of the Taskforce than the methods being proposed, and most already exist. Hold onto your wallets NSW taxpayers, you’re about to be taken on another unnecessary expensive ride

Mr David Benson [Signature #400]

Sun, 5 May 2013 05:23:27 UTC

Mr David Benson, Qld, Australia

Ms Carol Benson [Signature #399]

Sun, 5 May 2013 05:16:49 UTC

Ms Carol Benson, Qld, Australia

Dr Peter Coombe [Signature #398]

Fri, 3 May 2013 05:30:58 UTC

Dr Peter Coombe, Bega, NSW, Australia

I believe that what Dogs NSW have implemented for registered breeders is sufficient, and it is unfair and unreasonable to impose a costly two tier licensing system on registered breeders of pedigree dogs.

Ms Ann Pellew [Signature #397]

Thu, 2 May 2013 07:29:33 UTC

Ms Ann Pellew, NSW, Australia

Dogs NSW have been controlling the breeding of pure bred dogs very successfully for a very long time. This new proposal would be putting a lot of power with people who are more interested in throwing their weight around more than the interests of the dogs. The RSPCA needs to be accountable to a body that isn't only interested in money and power but in the dogs & pets that they are supposed to represent.

mr Darrell Ford [Signature #396]

Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:43:22 UTC

mr Darrell Ford, panania, nsw, Australia

Mrs Tracey Weight [Signature #395]

Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:32:27 UTC

Mrs Tracey Weight, Australia

Ms Catherine Shayler [Signature #394]

Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:30:20 UTC

Ms Catherine Shayler, Australia

ms Helen Wood [Signature #393]

Sat, 27 Apr 2013 04:45:52 UTC

ms Helen Wood, Australia

ms Nicole Tetley [Signature #392]

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:35:47 UTC

ms Nicole Tetley, Grenfell, NSW, Australia

Mrs Leanne M GORE [Signature #391]

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:09:12 UTC

Mrs Leanne M GORE, Australia

I am not in favour of a Duplicate Controlling Body, Fees, Regulations, Rules and Code of Ethics.

Nor am I in Favour, as one of the Responsible Owner/Breeder/Exhibitors that make up 99% of the Royal NSW Canine Control Council, (DogsNSW) Registered/Micro chipped Pure Bread Dog Owners/Breeders/Exhibitors, that you are trying to discriminate against in order to fund Unregistered/UnMicro chipped Companion Animals and Puppy farmers.

Ms Robyn N HUTTON [Signature #390]

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:07:10 UTC

Ms Robyn N HUTTON, Australia

I am not in Favour, as one of the Responsible Owner/Breeder/Exhibitors that make up 99% of the Royal NSW Canine Control Council, (DogsNSW) Registered/Micro chipped Pure Bread Dog Owners/Breeders/Exhibitors, that you are trying to discriminate against in order to fund Unregistered/UnMicro chipped Companion Animals and Puppy farmers.

Nor am I in favour of a Duplicate Controlling Body, Fees, Regulations, Rules and Code of Ethics.

Mrs Valerie J HUTTON [Signature #389]

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:57:18 UTC

Mrs Valerie J HUTTON, Australia

I am not in favour of a Duplicate Controlling Body, Fees, Regulations, Rules and Code of Ethics.

Mr Maxwell Hamilton [Signature #388]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:26:40 UTC

Mr Maxwell Hamilton, Moorland NSW, NSW, Australia

Mr Greg Manley [Signature #387]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 06:33:50 UTC

Mr Greg Manley, Bowral, N.S.W., Australia

Mr Stephen Gendle [Signature #386]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:41:43 UTC

Mr Stephen Gendle, Australia

Ms Rebecca Harrison [Signature #385]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:59:22 UTC

Ms Rebecca Harrison, Bowral, New South Wales, Australia

Ms Judy Docksey [Signature #384]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:41:00 UTC

Ms Judy Docksey, Luddenham, NSW, Australia

Mrs Sandra McBain [Signature #383]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:23:50 UTC

Mrs Sandra McBain, Minchinbury, NSW, Australia

I object to registered breeders of GSD dogs being lumped with backyard unregistered puppy breeders.

The registered Breeders all either tattoo, or microchip, or both all of their puppies, and they are in sound health when you purchase them, they are bred from good pedigree dogs, and in clean conditions, you know what you are buying, Backyard breedersm are the ones that should be penalised, for the conditions they have their animals living in, they are the puppy factories

Michael Trafford [Signature #382]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:21:15 UTC

Michael Trafford, Australia

Mr Robert H HUTTON [Signature #381]

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:15:10 UTC

Mr Robert H HUTTON, Australia

We do not require or need a mirror sight for Breeders and showers of Pure Breed dogs that are already well regulated and controlled by the Rules, Regulations and Code of ethics of the Australian National Kennel Council and the Royal NSW Canine Control (DogsNSW).

Mrs Carol Hamilton [Signature #380]

Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:51:55 UTC

Mrs Carol Hamilton, Moorland, NSW, Australia

Members of Dogs NSW are ethical and abide by their code and do not need any further regulation.

mr Lafaele Matakaiongo [Signature #379]

Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:41:49 UTC

mr Lafaele Matakaiongo, werrington county, Australia

Mr Greg Jones [Signature #378]

Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:16:48 UTC

Mr Greg Jones, Warrimoo, NSW, Australia

Ms Elizabeth Haigh [Signature #377]

Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:12:54 UTC

Ms Elizabeth Haigh, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Mr Graham Haigh [Signature #376]

Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:07:47 UTC

Mr Graham Haigh, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Ms Janet Earl [Signature #375]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:24:40 UTC

Ms Janet Earl, Australia

Mr, Boyd Germyn [Signature #374]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 10:57:31 UTC

Mr, Boyd Germyn, NSW Australia, Australia

Mrs Michelle Jones [Signature #373]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 09:54:55 UTC

Mrs Michelle Jones, Fitzroy Falls, NSW, Australia

Karen Mitchell [Signature #372]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 09:44:14 UTC

Karen Mitchell, Australia

Mrs Margaret Haigh [Signature #371]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:20:14 UTC

Mrs Margaret Haigh, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

miss Jessica Van Linden [Signature #370]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 09:14:19 UTC

miss Jessica Van Linden, Mt Kembla, NSW, Australia

I strongly concur with all the statements for and against the proposals that Dogs NSW have made. As a dog owner who's parents and I have had over 30 years of German Shepherds from the same pedigree breeder, I feel that there are amendments that need to be made to ensure that quality bred dogs do not become obsolete. Therefore any practices that support the registered Breeders of all pedigree dogs in NSW has my support.

Mrs Donna Maher [Signature #369]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 06:48:03 UTC

Mrs Donna Maher, Sawtell, NSW, Australia

I agree with the above 100%.

Mrs Judith Ellis [Signature #368]

Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:52:18 UTC

Mrs Judith Ellis, Rooty Hill, NSW, Australia

Miss Sheree Whitehead [Signature #367]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:05:10 UTC

Miss Sheree Whitehead, Australia

Peta Stewart [Signature #366]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:20:23 UTC

Peta Stewart, Ellerston, Nsw, Australia

Miss Kathy Watson [Signature #365]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:33:18 UTC

Miss Kathy Watson, Orange, NSW, Australia

My dogs have all come from registered breeders, these people care for their an imals and also where their puppies go to and if i have had any questions about the pups they have been always happy and supportive

Anna Ugrinic [Signature #364]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:12:30 UTC

Anna Ugrinic, Australia

In support of Dogs NSW against the so-called recommendations. Responsible owners do not want to buy dogs from cruel puppy farms which these recommendations are tacitly advocating

mrs stapley sandra [Signature #363]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:49:53 UTC

mrs stapley sandra, mulgoa, Australia

I believe that Dogs NSW do a very good job without this breeder licencing scheme, it will only push good and responsible breeders from doing what they love as it costs enough money now and will encourage a whole new blackmarket type back yard breeders who do not care for the love of their particuliar breed only for the money.

Mr Reg Parker [Signature #362]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:55:31 UTC

Mr Reg Parker, Dubbo, NSW, Australia

It's about time, stupid politicians checked out the breeding practices and ethics of registered breeders, and what they are trying to achieve instead of going off half cocked and showing just how stupid most politicians really are. Direct their energies towards backyard breeders and puppy farms who actually cause the problems.

Miss Rebecca Aliverti [Signature #361]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:54:25 UTC

Miss Rebecca Aliverti, Bargo, NSW, Australia

I support and agree with all of the comments put forward by Dogs NSW

If this goes forward, the general public will miss out on purchasing a pedigree dog which has had all relevant hereditary testing done, it will also have far reaching ramifications into the Veterinary & Pet Food industry & all businesses relating, thereby causing unemployment throughout NSW.

It will take away the hobby of showing, obedience etc from countless aged pensioners who enjoy this sport, many to which it is the only pleasure & happiness which they get from life.

I have had German Shepherds for over 44 years, do all required hereditary disease testing, micro-chip & tattoo prior to registration, vaccinate & sell my puppies on a contract, as do all breeders I know. Many of my puppy buyers have returned over the years, for their 2nd, 3rd, & 4th puppy, I must be doing something right!

Also, Dogs NSW have a very extensive Data Base in place, dating back many years, if it transpires, it is they who should be registrar for this proposal.

This Act will NOT decrease the number of animals being euthanased, but drive BYBs & Puppy Farmers further underground & support commercial breeders, not hobbyists.

Mrs Dianne Aliverti [Signature #360]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:53:10 UTC

Mrs Dianne Aliverti, Bargo, NSW, Australia

I support and agree with all of the comments put forward by Dogs NSW

It will take away the hobby of showing, obedience etc from countless aged pensioners who enjoy this sport, many to which it is the only pleasure & happiness which they get from life.

Also, Dogs NSW have a very extensive Data Base in place, dating back many years, if it transpires, it is they who should be registrar for this proposal.

This Act will NOT decrease the number of animals being euthanased, but drive BYBs & Puppy Farmers further underground & support commercial breeders, not hobbyists.

Mr Henry Aliverti [Signature #359]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:48:46 UTC

Mr Henry Aliverti, Bargo, NSW, Australia

We already have strict regulations from Dogs NSW and The German Sherpherd League (they do a great job), we pay anual reg. fees for this. As usual we the good people have to pay and suffer because of the rooten apples. Or is the goverment trying to rake more money for the refos.

Mrs Patricia Smith [Signature #358]

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:44:59 UTC

Mrs Patricia Smith, Lakesland, NSW, Australia

I support and agree with all of the comments put forward by Dogs NSW

It will take away the hobby of showing, obedience etc from countless aged pensioners who enjoy this sport, many to which it is the only pleasure & happiness which they get from life.

Also, Dogs NSW have a very extensive Data Base in place, dating back many years, if it transpires, it is they who should be registrar for this proposal.

This Act will NOT decrease the number of animals being euthanased, but drive BYBs & Puppy Farmers further underground & support commercial breeders, not hobbyists.

mrs Julie Nelson [Signature #357]

Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:38:27 UTC

mrs Julie Nelson, Ganmain, Please select, Australia

Mrs Aileen Jenkins [Signature #356]

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:29:46 UTC

Mrs Aileen Jenkins, Australia

Ms Beverley Ellis [Signature #355]

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:15:19 UTC

Ms Beverley Ellis, Australia

M Kylie Friend [Signature #354]

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:13:44 UTC

M Kylie Friend, silverdale, nsw, Australia

mr daniel gilson [Signature #353]

Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:50:21 UTC

mr daniel gilson, glossodia, new south wales, Australia