MR David Bottomley [Signature #111]</h1> <article> <h1>MR David Bottomley [Signature #111]</h1> <p>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 06:47:02 UTC</p> MR David Bottomley<p>Brockley Cross Action Group was founded specifically to try and tackle improving the poor reputation and environment of this area, as a result of lack of investment and neglect by Lewisham Council. This area is now slowly being improved and fit for residential communities and small commercial outlets. The worst possible thing Lewisham Council could do is make this area the target for a drug and alcohol rehabilitation centre. I would suggest a far better site is in Deptford or New cross that Lewisham Council already ruined in the 1960's by demolishing all the housing and where such a centre would not have so negative an effect.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #110]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:51:34 UTC</p> Anonymous, Brockley, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ms Hilary McLaughlin [Signature #109]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:49:15 UTC</p> Ms Hilary McLaughlin, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #108]</h1> <p>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:10:58 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #107]</h1> <p>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:18:45 UTC</p> Anonymous, Brockley, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #106]</h1> <p>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:50:51 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #105]</h1> <p>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:49:25 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr David Mulholland [Signature #104]</h1> <p>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:26:19 UTC</p> Mr David Mulholland, Brockley, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>miss s cooke [Signature #103]</h1> <p>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:04:58 UTC</p> miss s cooke, london, london, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ms Melanie Potro [Signature #102]</h1> <p>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:58:36 UTC</p> Ms Melanie Potro, london, london, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ms L Swan [Signature #101]</h1> <p>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:16:39 UTC</p> Ms L Swan, London </article> <article> <h1>Mr Geoffrey Taylor [Signature #100]</h1> <p>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:06:43 UTC</p> Mr Geoffrey Taylor<p>This service is needed, but the location will not be easily accessible by public transport for the majority of North Lewisham clients. The building and it's surrounding are also unsuitable for this type of use.<br /> A better and more pleasant venue would be the Waldron Health Centre!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Jenna Blick [Signature #99]</h1> <p>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:51:08 UTC</p> Jenna Blick </article> <article> <h1>Mr Nigel Mawbey [Signature #98]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:11:26 UTC</p> Mr Nigel Mawbey </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #97]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:28:10 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>the area is residential. There is no need for such a centre.</p> </article> <article> <h1>miss Anonymous [Signature #96]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:20:54 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>I do not want the area to be degrated. It is unsafe and unsecure for children</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Emma Cousin [Signature #95]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:41:50 UTC</p> Miss Emma Cousin, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ms Hannah Plant [Signature #94]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:59:30 UTC</p> Ms Hannah Plant, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr Robert cousin [Signature #93]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:25:16 UTC</p> mr Robert cousin, Brockley, London, United Kingdom<p>Why not spend this money on a positive project to aid people in the area that deserve it such as teachers, social services and the forces.too many people destroy their and others life's then expect the hard workers to support and pay for their recovery. I say development should be positive and should improve the area making it more attractive to those local citizens who work hard to maintain the country.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Garth Inman [Signature #92]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:28:29 UTC</p> Mr Garth Inman, London<p>Any drug and alcohol treatment centre must be a bad neighbour by reason of the concentration in one place of people whom the majority will not wish to encounter. The location is unsuitable because it is in a densely residential area close to schools.A more appropriate site in an anonymous area which will not impinge on people who live in the vicinity such as that in Lewisham High St should be found</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Frances Currie [Signature #91]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:45:35 UTC</p> Ms Frances Currie<p>Of course centres like this need a place to be, but near to people's houses and in a place where children pass on foot on the school run is not that place. The 999 Club on Deptford Broadway is situated in a much better location, for example.</p> </article> <article> <h1>susan cousin [Signature #90]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:06:10 UTC</p> susan cousin<p>Lewisham High Street is not too far to travel for these facilities. I regularly travel there to go to the nearest gym and main shopping centre. With centres already in Lewisham High Street and Forest Hill, surely there is adequate provision already? What numbers of demand is this proposal based on, and where do the potential users currently live? I doubt very much they live in Brockley, so would be travelling in to use it.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Maria Basset [Signature #89]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:46:53 UTC</p> Mrs Maria Basset, London, london, England<p>this has not been an open consultation from the start.Most of the residents only found out about this proposal through the Mercury newspaper.If they truly want to help drug and alcohol rehabilitation they should place these centres in modern NHS Buildings that are permanent and anonimous like the Waldron Health Centre, not in a residential area with nurseries and schools next to them.They have been less than honest with the community they want support from.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr A Battersby [Signature #88]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:55:34 UTC</p> Mr A Battersby, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr simon smith [Signature #87]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:49:30 UTC</p> Mr simon smith, london, London, United Kingdom<p>This is a totally inappropriate site for this facility.</p> <p>There has been a totally underhand method of trying to push it through using very dubious methodology and contradictory statements.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Joanne Ryan [Signature #86]</h1> <p>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:08:23 UTC</p> Miss Joanne Ryan, London </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #85]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:06:20 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>This site is not appropriate, it is a residential area, will cause more antisocial behaviour, it is not the most central place, should stay in Lewisham, or somewhere more central like the Waldron centre which is already there and has great transport links</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Anonymous [Signature #84]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 01:37:40 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Mr P Juniper [Signature #83]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 01:35:30 UTC</p> Mr P Juniper </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Eugenie Poulet [Signature #82]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:04:47 UTC</p> Mrs Eugenie Poulet </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #81]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 06:05:34 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>Terrible idea</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Jeffrey Dellow [Signature #80]</h1> <p>Tue, 8 Nov 2011 02:53:42 UTC</p> Mr Jeffrey Dellow, London, U.K, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #79]</h1> <p>Tue, 8 Nov 2011 02:17:56 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #78]</h1> <p>Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:16:40 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>MR STEPHEN BARTLETT [Signature #77]</h1> <p>Tue, 8 Nov 2011 07:57:41 UTC</p> MR STEPHEN BARTLETT, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Stuart Wright [Signature #76]</h1> <p>Sun, 6 Nov 2011 05:19:32 UTC</p> Mr Stuart Wright, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>miss nicole inman [Signature #75]</h1> <p>Sun, 6 Nov 2011 04:17:02 UTC</p> miss nicole inman </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #74]</h1> <p>Sun, 6 Nov 2011 04:05:49 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #73]</h1> <p>Sun, 6 Nov 2011 04:05:46 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>S Faulkner [Signature #72]</h1> <p>Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:18:23 UTC</p> S Faulkner<p>Lewisham's proposal does not seek to consult and consider the true effects to the Brockley people and area and whether it is really the correct location within the borough. There has been no solid information supplied to if it is in the correct proximity to other services/access and needs - that information should have been provided to local residents prior to any meetings... in short where is your proof that this is the best place for a centre?</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr D Dekker [Signature #71]</h1> <p>Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:01:06 UTC</p> Mr D Dekker, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Emilio Bielsa [Signature #70]</h1> <p>Sat, 5 Nov 2011 05:43:20 UTC</p> Mr Emilio Bielsa, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Jack Day [Signature #69]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 01:28:07 UTC</p> Mr Jack Day, brockley<p>This paves the way for the council to justify opening yet more hostels in the area to justify the centre and ensure it remains for the long-term. Self perpetuating cycle - move more substances in the area then the greater demand for this kind of service.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #68]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:33:31 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>Not appropriate for residential area near to infant schools & nurseries</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #67]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:31:46 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>Totally inappropriate for residential area near to infant schools & nurseries</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Anonymous [Signature #66]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:21:55 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Mr Sam Wilde [Signature #65]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:09:06 UTC</p> Mr Sam Wilde<p>This is an important facility but the wrong site. The Waldron Centre seems the obvious candidate.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #64]</h1> <p>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 05:57:08 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Simon Drenton [Signature #63]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:19:52 UTC</p> Simon Drenton </article> <article> <h1>Ruth Hopkinson [Signature #62]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 05:36:45 UTC</p> Ruth Hopkinson, London </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #61]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 04:15:19 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>This is completely a inappropriate site for this centre.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr S Jones [Signature #60]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 03:53:31 UTC</p> Mr S Jones<p>Inappropriate space on a residential street. The council have provided no evidence of need by ward, and the is not centrally located to serve all three wards, new ross, deptford and Brockley. Somewhere like the Waldron centre would be better suited, excellent facilities, great bus and train links, and near Deptford police station, so they can deter criminal elements likely to target vulnerable groups.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr G Taylor [Signature #59]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:50:12 UTC</p> Mr G Taylor, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr david orgles [Signature #58]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 05:31:30 UTC</p> mr david orgles, london </article> <article> <h1>miss Anonymous [Signature #57]</h1> <p>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 05:11:00 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>I'm all for having the centre but I think there are more appropriate locations. What's wrong with locating it at the waldren or goodwood road medical centres?</p> </article> <article> <h1>ms meier lo [Signature #56]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:05:28 UTC</p> ms meier lo, brockley, london, United Kingdom<p>accorording to CRi's risk matrix, there is a moderate likelihood of moderately severe agression from service users. Staff working within the premises will wear/carry personal alarms. Will local residents also be issued personal alarms?</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss Tania Hill [Signature #55]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:51:13 UTC</p> Miss Tania Hill </article> <article> <h1>Miss Lucia Felix [Signature #54]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:51:01 UTC</p> Miss Lucia Felix, New Cross, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr John Morgan [Signature #53]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:29:46 UTC</p> Mr John Morgan<p>We already have a high concentration of floating support for users in the area.<br /> The location is actually not a good one for transport to Lewisham as Brockley Station leads all points south and n/east.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #52]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 03:26:20 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>This is quite clearly poorly located for those that would need to make use of the centre. It has a very short lease, which would only ever make it suitable for the short term. I also oppose due to the potentially negative impact on the surrounding businesses and residents.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #51]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:40:14 UTC</p> Anonymous, Brockley, London, United Kingdom<p>There are plenty more suitable location. There is an obvious lack of concern for decent people living in the area.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Jana Haldrich [Signature #50]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:31:10 UTC</p> Mrs Jana Haldrich </article> <article> <h1>Miss Naomi Watson [Signature #49]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:06:52 UTC</p> Miss Naomi Watson </article> <article> <h1>Ms Linda Ferguson [Signature #48]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:05:45 UTC</p> Ms Linda Ferguson, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ken Norton [Signature #47]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 07:45:20 UTC</p> Ken Norton<p>Too many families with small children close by, also too many halfway houses in the area.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Daryl Henderson [Signature #46]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:59:33 UTC</p> Mr Daryl Henderson, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr Anonymous [Signature #45]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:48:32 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ian Richardson [Signature #44]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 05:57:57 UTC</p> Ian Richardson </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #43]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 05:42:31 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Dr Simon Montford [Signature #42]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 05:28:54 UTC</p> Dr Simon Montford, London, United Kingdom<p>So far the consultation appears to be a sham. The site is a tiny commercial area in the midst of a large residential area including schools and childcare centres.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr William Hare [Signature #41]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:59:37 UTC</p> Mr William Hare, Brockley, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Gary McGhee [Signature #40]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:51:53 UTC</p> Mr Gary McGhee, Brockley, London, United Kingdom<p>Is the choice of this site primarily a cost-cutting exercise?</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Anonymous [Signature #39]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:39:22 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #38]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 04:38:03 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #37]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:54:05 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Kraig Donald [Signature #36]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:51:07 UTC</p> Mr Kraig Donald, Brockley, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mrs sally brenner [Signature #35]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:07:17 UTC</p> mrs sally brenner </article> <article> <h1>mrs jennifer allen [Signature #34]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:05:29 UTC</p> mrs jennifer allen </article> <article> <h1>mr richard allen [Signature #33]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:03:56 UTC</p> mr richard allen </article> <article> <h1>Dr Robert Hudson [Signature #32]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:09:51 UTC</p> Dr Robert Hudson, London, United Kingdom<p>The proposal to transfer a very valuable service to this particular location has not been justified. It would be inconveniently situated for service users, and would be likely to bring anti-social behaviour to an area which is currently relatively free from it and which is not well-covered by potential response services.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms Alex Calinescu [Signature #31]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:12:46 UTC</p> Ms Alex Calinescu, London, United Kingdom<p>This is not an appropriate site for the centre.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ian Corbin [Signature #30]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 04:57:59 UTC</p> Ian Corbin, Brockley, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Ema Felix [Signature #29]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 04:36:38 UTC</p> Ema Felix, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr matthew merry [Signature #28]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 04:06:41 UTC</p> mr matthew merry </article> <article> <h1>Mr Glenn Mottershead [Signature #27]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 04:06:15 UTC</p> Mr Glenn Mottershead, London<p>I feel that the space is not appropriate for the health and safety and general well being of staff, their clients and the many residents of the Lewisham wards of Brockley and New Cross. The Waldron Centre outside New Cross Station is a much more open space for the integration of the NHS's clients and for the community as a whole.</p> </article> <article> <h1>mrs Anonymous [Signature #26]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 03:07:49 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr David Hill [Signature #25]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:37:08 UTC</p> Mr David Hill, London, United Kingdom<p>The site is not appropriate</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Ben Pearce [Signature #24]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:28:34 UTC</p> Mr Ben Pearce, United Kingdom<p>I dont support the location of this proposal in a residential area</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs M Mitchell [Signature #23]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:03:17 UTC</p> Mrs M Mitchell </article> <article> <h1>Mr Graeme Mitchell [Signature #22]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:50:38 UTC</p> Mr Graeme Mitchell<p>I really don't think this is a good idea with 2 childcare centres around the corner.</p> </article> <article> <h1>jessica cooper [Signature #21]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:50:18 UTC</p> jessica cooper </article> <article> <h1>Mr Barry L Smith [Signature #20]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:43:38 UTC</p> Mr Barry L Smith, London<p>Of course it's a good idea to put this next to a pre-school centre!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Nick Marsh [Signature #19]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:30:48 UTC</p> Mr Nick Marsh, London<p>This is obviously a very bad idea. Brockley cross has the potential to be a busy and pleasant community hub. The councils relentless failure to invest in making it a better place to live and shop (dangerous double roundabout unresolved, persistent parking offences going unchecked, selfish van hire companies taking up parking and blocking footpaths not prosecuted, businesses not being monitored for backlit signs etc etc etc) is now transformed to ACTIVELY making it a place that people will avoid!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Peri Mackintosh [Signature #18]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:15:22 UTC</p> Peri Mackintosh </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #17]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:13:11 UTC</p> Anonymous, Brockley, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #16]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:19:03 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom<p>Please reconsider this proposal.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #15]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:11:50 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Mr Alex Smith [Signature #14]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:00:05 UTC</p> Mr Alex Smith, United Kingdom<p>The lease of the premises is too short for a facility like this as it provides no long term solution. The council should invest in a site with long term potential.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Miss SJ Cole [Signature #13]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:35:09 UTC</p> Miss SJ Cole, brockley, london, United Kingdom<p>Inappropriate location</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Colin Garvey [Signature #12]</h1> <p>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:23:15 UTC</p> Mr Colin Garvey, Brockley </article> </main></body></html>