Heath Lodge site should remain as accommodation providing care to Hanwell’s elderly population Petition: Signature List Feed http://gopetition.com/signatures/heath-lodge-site-should-remain-as-accommodation-providing-care-to-hanwells-elderly-population.html Online petition signatures en-us Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:22 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition Mary Diver [Signature #141] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10166600?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:59:59 UTC 10166600 Mrs Tracy Weller [Signature #140] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10166046?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 03:45:27 UTC 10166046 Mr Michael Lannigan [Signature #139] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10165498?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 02:29:17 UTC 10165498 Anonymous [Signature #138] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10165003?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 01:17:29 UTC 10165003 Mrs Teresa Tranter [Signature #137] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10162355?utm_medium=rss Facilities for the Elderly in Hanwell appear to be overlooked. Consideration for that age group should be reviewed. Over zealous planning to revitalise a forgotten plot should not accepted at any cost

]]> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 UTC 10162355 Mr Anonymous [Signature #136] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10161934?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:39:46 UTC 10161934 mrs tameeza henriot [Signature #135] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10161566?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 05:50:34 UTC 10161566 Dr Joan Tilburn [Signature #134] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10161237?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 05:10:49 UTC 10161237 Mr Chris Christofi [Signature #133] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10161092?utm_medium=rss I object to the proposed development for the reasons outlined above.

]]> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:51:35 UTC 10161092 Mrs Maria de Mendoza [Signature #132] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10160972?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:36:01 UTC 10160972 Mrs Melanie Farrow [Signature #131] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10160581?utm_medium=rss Ex resident of Cherington Road Hanwell - this proposal will result in too many people in the immediate vicinity. Cherington Rd is too congested already. I support the idea of maintaining the site for use by the elderly.

]]> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 03:43:16 UTC 10160581 Mrs Fran Carpenter [Signature #130] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10160545?utm_medium=rss As a former resident in this area, with family still living there, I am strongly opposed to this development. Parking around this area is very difficult as it is, and this huge increase in numbers of residents is therefore unsustainable without causing considerable problems to existing residents in surrounding roads.

]]> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 03:38:00 UTC 10160545 Mr David Carpenter [Signature #129] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10160518?utm_medium=rss I am very strongly opposed to this care home being demolished and flats replacing it. Not only will the street scene be changed drastically and for the worse, but we will be losing a valuable facility in Hanwell.

]]> Tue, 5 Apr 2011 03:34:18 UTC 10160518 Mrs Noreen Cooper [Signature #128] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10160429?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Apr 2011 03:22:53 UTC 10160429 ms Rukhshana Daruwalla [Signature #127] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10158375?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:05:34 UTC 10158375 Mrs Julia Muman [Signature #126] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10158142?utm_medium=rss Too many flats in this already congested area

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:21:58 UTC 10158142 Mrs Denise Mortby [Signature #125] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10158048?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:06:15 UTC 10158048 mr sandy bruce [Signature #124] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10157342?utm_medium=rss I think that Heath Lodge should remain as esidentail care for the elderly

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:20:21 UTC 10157342 Mr Peter Hutchison [Signature #123] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156996?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:31:23 UTC 10156996 Peter Fordham [Signature #122] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156715?utm_medium=rss I oppose the development of the above site for high density housing as the whole area is being swamped with new housing without thought to the impact on the community. As the site was a residential home it should remain in the community domain as services i.e. Hanwell library are all under threat or over subscribed whilst every scrap of land is being eaten up for largely high density housing which while lining some peoples pockets puts yet more of a burden on the existing community.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:55:14 UTC 10156715 Mr Terence Welsh [Signature #121] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156566?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:37:57 UTC 10156566 Ms Amanda Welsh [Signature #120] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156557?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:36:29 UTC 10156557 Ms Stephanie Sundle [Signature #119] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156335?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:02:19 UTC 10156335 mr philip jackson [Signature #118] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156302?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:58:43 UTC 10156302 Mrs Dulcina D'Souza [Signature #117] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156228?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:45:22 UTC 10156228 andrzej solinski [Signature #116] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10156144?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:30:19 UTC 10156144 Mr. David Blackwell [Signature #115] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10155906?utm_medium=rss The application is totally unsuitable and unwanted.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:53:19 UTC 10155906 ms Anonymous [Signature #114] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10155806?utm_medium=rss lack of elderly facilities in ealing, threat of closure of public facilities such as hanwell library does not support building more flats in Hanwell, cambridge yard development enough in area under pressure of poulation overdevelopment and having reduced infrastructure to support leisure and education.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:37:40 UTC 10155806 Mrs Em Johnson [Signature #113] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10155795?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:36:10 UTC 10155795 MR Dominic Novak [Signature #112] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10155772?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:32:41 UTC 10155772 Mr Alex Novak [Signature #111] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10155060?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:44:10 UTC 10155060 Mr barry Morgan [Signature #110] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154793?utm_medium=rss My grandmother was a resident in the home many years ago and it would be a great shame to lose such a facility especially as the proposed plan would contribute to increasing overcrowding and the fact that the site in question has poor road access.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:07:06 UTC 10154793 Mrs Patricia Novak [Signature #109] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154644?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:43:54 UTC 10154644 Mr Daniel Novak [Signature #108] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154594?utm_medium=rss Totally opposed to this ill-thought out application. It will add nothing to the area, while compounding existing problems as well as creating its own.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:38:08 UTC 10154594 Mrs Sally Ali [Signature #107] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154420?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:16:10 UTC 10154420 Ms Maggie Beirne [Signature #106] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154027?utm_medium=rss Ealing Council opposed this planning permission previously and little has changed since. Excessive development on this site will cause a variety of environmental problems, especially when added to the development already planned in the immediate area.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:24:21 UTC 10154027 Mrs Anonymous [Signature #105] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10154018?utm_medium=rss I am opposed to any further overdevelopment that is making Hanwell unpleasantly overcrowded, putting a strain on local infrastructure and facilities, and exacerbating existing traffic congestion

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:23:13 UTC 10154018 Mrs Krysia Januszczyk [Signature #104] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153785?utm_medium=rss too many units for the space,designs out of character fort the area, not enough parking provision, busy road junction for access is dangerous

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:52:10 UTC 10153785 Malcolm Weller [Signature #103] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153581?utm_medium=rss I agree completely with this petition/

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:26:50 UTC 10153581 Virginia Fassnidge [Signature #102] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153529?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:21:29 UTC 10153529 Ann Craig [Signature #101] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153457?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:12:43 UTC 10153457 Mrs. Paola Cottrell [Signature #100] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153413?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:07:12 UTC 10153413 Mrs Mary Gill [Signature #99] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10153210?utm_medium=rss I feel this is an overbuild for this site. The amount of houses and flats will put extra pressure on local road especially Balfour as there is no left turn from exit of site.

The local schools, doctors etc are full to capacity. I feel Hanwell has reached busting point with all the new developments.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:36:00 UTC 10153210 Mrs Jane Hartwell [Signature #98] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152865?utm_medium=rss I think that we need to adress the needs of the eldery in the borough urgently.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:57:59 UTC 10152865 Steve Whitehead [Signature #97] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152796?utm_medium=rss This change of use should not be allowed.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:50:39 UTC 10152796 Ms Brigitte Flock [Signature #96] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152775?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:47:45 UTC 10152775 Mrs Kate Mollan [Signature #95] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152750?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:43:57 UTC 10152750 Anonymous [Signature #94] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152734?utm_medium=rss I am opposed to the above development and feel The Heath lodge site should be used for the care of the elderley in our community. We need care , facilities and accomodation for the elderley who paid and supported our society. They need to be near their families and still be part of what is their own local community.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:42:18 UTC 10152734 Ms Bridget Holmstrom [Signature #93] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152700?utm_medium=rss The proposed development is clearly far too much and too dense for the space available. It is clearly not in keeping with the area and does nothing to enhance Hanwell

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:39:04 UTC 10152700 mrs Carol Collison [Signature #92] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152692?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:38:15 UTC 10152692 Dr Kenneth Barry Walker [Signature #91] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152440?utm_medium=rss This proposal reduces already limited elderly care capacity at a time of increased life expectancy and aging population overall. A significant over development of a small site is also a factor in my opposition.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:07:28 UTC 10152440 Mr Bryan Kelly [Signature #90] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152343?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:56:22 UTC 10152343 Mrs Anonymous [Signature #89] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152326?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:54:30 UTC 10152326 Christopher Warleigh-Lack [Signature #88] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152164?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:30:59 UTC 10152164 Ms Anonymous [Signature #87] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152115?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:22:49 UTC 10152115 Mr Christopher Edwards [Signature #86] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10152088?utm_medium=rss I object to loss of a much needed care home, and to the gross overdevelopment of this site. Proposal would be massively out of scale and dominate surrounding area.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 03:18:17 UTC 10152088 Mr A Belfrage [Signature #85] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151917?utm_medium=rss The care home is an important assett to the community. The area does not need more flats/housing with the added vehicle congestion and pressure on services that such developments bring.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:49:39 UTC 10151917 mr phillip hards [Signature #84] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151912?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:48:11 UTC 10151912 Mr David Clarke [Signature #83] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151908?utm_medium=rss as per petition test..

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:47:37 UTC 10151908 Mr Michael Flatman [Signature #82] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151857?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:40:12 UTC 10151857 Mr Edward Farrell [Signature #81] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151850?utm_medium=rss I object to this development as it is gross overdevelopment of this site. The loss of accomodation for the elderly must not be permitted.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:38:39 UTC 10151850 Maria Lazarides [Signature #80] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151686?utm_medium=rss This is madness adding to more congeston on the busy Hanwell area. You need more care homes for the elderly.
Is this a done deal already !!!!!

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:05:08 UTC 10151686 Ms Jessica Beaghen [Signature #79] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151671?utm_medium=rss The elderly need care so much more than we need this housing, which is too tall for the neighbourhood, doesn't provdie adequate parking, nor does it serve the needs of our community.

]]> Mon, 4 Apr 2011 02:01:56 UTC 10151671 Mr Graham Heath [Signature #78] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10151072?utm_medium=rss Sadly Ealing Council will ignore the local community as they always do in favour of developers. The oldest cottage (locally listed) in York Ave was demolished to make way for a hideous development of flats that bore no resemblance to the drawings submitted to the planning committee. I'm afraid despite this petition it's a done deal.

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:32:19 UTC 10151072 Ms Heather Matlock [Signature #77] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10150678?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 08:08:08 UTC 10150678 Dr Isabelle Cenci di Bello [Signature #76] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10150623?utm_medium=rss Heath Lodge should be redeveloped to provide care for our increasingly elderly population. There is a huge insufficient of residential care homes in Hanwel

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 07:49:02 UTC 10150623 Mrs Rosemary Nash [Signature #75] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10150131?utm_medium=rss Insuffient amenities in the area to support extra residents ie, schools, doctors, dentist. Not enough care homes for the elderly

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:33:14 UTC 10150131 Miss Sandra Clark [Signature #74] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149961?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:06:18 UTC 10149961 Mrs Dominique Morgan [Signature #73] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149910?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:57:49 UTC 10149910 Mr David Whitestone [Signature #72] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149850?utm_medium=rss In addition to the unacceptable change of use the scheme does not sit comfortably in its location. The massing is heavy and the scheme out of scale with neighbouring properties. It will dominate all the residential properties not only immediately adjacent, but along Church Road and Cherrington Road. A less dense and less tall scheme could be made to work; it is possible to design a building that will be of benefit to the area rather than something that will blight it for ever.

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:48:17 UTC 10149850 Mrs Janet Sacks [Signature #71] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149789?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:38:00 UTC 10149789 Mr Tim Williams [Signature #70] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149764?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:32:13 UTC 10149764 Mrs Davina Brooks [Signature #69] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149732?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:27:32 UTC 10149732 Mr Nigel Brooks [Signature #68] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149729?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:27:00 UTC 10149729 Mr David Strachan [Signature #67] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149706?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:23:37 UTC 10149706 Anonymous [Signature #66] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149645?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:14:04 UTC 10149645 mr peter chadburn [Signature #65] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149571?utm_medium=rss This site is quite small and the plans just sound ridicluous

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:01:04 UTC 10149571 Mrs Kathleen Maloney [Signature #64] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149563?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 04:00:16 UTC 10149563 Ms christine chapman [Signature #63] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149156?utm_medium=rss The change of use is unsustainable and immoral.

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 03:02:56 UTC 10149156 Dr Abigail Woods [Signature #62] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10149044?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 02:47:39 UTC 10149044 Miss Leah Hillman [Signature #61] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148952?utm_medium=rss The plans clearly show overdevelopment of the site suggested in an area already densely populated.
The site should be saved and supported in becoming a residential home for the elderly again.

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 02:35:33 UTC 10148952 Mr Eric Leach [Signature #60] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148905?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 02:30:56 UTC 10148905 Mrs Alison Thpmas [Signature #59] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148847?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 02:24:06 UTC 10148847 John Bowman [Signature #58] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148562?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 01:47:31 UTC 10148562 Mr Nick Smith [Signature #57] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148506?utm_medium=rss My Family and i do not want to look out our window at a 4 story complex every day!!! keep the population low and stop the greed of developing!!!!!makes me sick......

]]> Sun, 3 Apr 2011 01:41:27 UTC 10148506 Mr Sean Amoroso [Signature #56] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/10148503?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Apr 2011 01:41:07 UTC 10148503 Mr Konrad Jankowski [Signature #55] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8660804?utm_medium=rss The architect and developers have shown no regard for the way the site will affect local residents' lives. Traffic management in Balfour Avenue and Cherington Road, the 24/7 security of the site, drainage as well as various environmental issues arising from the huge amounts of excavation and demolition have been completely ignored by the developers. Their arrogance in pushing forth this appallingly designed eyesore at several community meetings has been monumental. This must be stopped.

]]> Thu, 7 Oct 2010 04:23:36 UTC 8660804 Ms Anonymous [Signature #54] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8618173?utm_medium=rss Retain old peoples' homes. Also project too crowded. Homes are for living and should have sufficient space and surrounds. Design should be sympathetic with area. Narrow entrance unacceptable/dangerous.

]]> Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:31:00 UTC 8618173 Mr Al Gregg [Signature #53] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8613302?utm_medium=rss Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:47:26 UTC 8613302 Mr Chris Cook [Signature #52] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8609310?utm_medium=rss Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:57:46 UTC 8609310 Mr Christos Grey Tsangakos [Signature #51] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8570236?utm_medium=rss I strongly support that:
Heath Lodge site should remain as accommodation providing care to Hanwell’s elderly population.

]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:03:17 UTC 8570236 ms Androulla Kyriacou [Signature #50] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8569191?utm_medium=rss If the site is not retained as a home for elderly people, the new development should keep to the height and building materials of existing buildings.

Far too many flats have been built to minimal space standards, this just creates problems for families and the community.

]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:15:51 UTC 8569191 Ms Jayne Hilditch [Signature #49] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8563448?utm_medium=rss I believe the proposed redevelopment of the site represents a significant missed opportunity to raise the capital infrastructure of area. A residential development, preferably for older people (given it's proximity to amenities of Hanwell) designed to CABE's "building for life" standards would be a better addition to the neighbourhood.

]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:54:19 UTC 8563448 Ms Lorraine Gilbert [Signature #48] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8558828?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:05:53 UTC 8558828 Mr Micheal Doyle [Signature #47] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8552889?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:36:39 UTC 8552889 Mr John Molloy [Signature #46] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8543447?utm_medium=rss Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:39:31 UTC 8543447 Ms Tara Rooney [Signature #45] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8543423?utm_medium=rss Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:34:27 UTC 8543423 Mr Paul Swift [Signature #44] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8538628?utm_medium=rss A developer hell bent on High Density Dwellings that are totally out of character and unsympathetic to the surrounding area

]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:42:45 UTC 8538628 Mr's Lilian Novak [Signature #43] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8535975?utm_medium=rss This development needs to be used for a care home for the elderly and the current proposal is very ugly,we are the one that have to live with it and look at it.

]]> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:29:32 UTC 8535975 Mr Donald Legg [Signature #42] https://gopetition.com/signature/locate/8533122?utm_medium=rss The site should be retained as a location for much needed elderly care facilities.
In addition to total demolition the plan calls for deep excavation giving rise to hundreds of lorry loads of muckaway exiting onto Cherington Rd one-way system for perhaps 18 months. Proposal makes no mention of potential drain and sewer overloading from the additional dwellings. The design and finish of block visible from Church Rd. is overly massive and totally at odds with the existing domestic architecture.

]]> Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:49:03 UTC 8533122