Paul Scott [Signature #97]</h1> <article> <h1>Paul Scott [Signature #97]</h1> <p>Thu, 19 May 2022 05:21:40 UTC</p> Paul Scott, Ilford, Essex, United Kingdom<p>We have more than enough tower blocks around this area already.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Christine Cerqueda [Signature #96]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:39:32 UTC</p> Christine Cerqueda, Paranaque, Metro Manila, Philippines </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #95]</h1> <p>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:47:54 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #94]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:03:43 UTC</p> Anonymous<p>Impact on existing high rise residential should be carefully considered</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #93]</h1> <p>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:06:07 UTC</p> Anonymous, london, United States of America<p>too many developments on such a small island.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Lisa Brookes [Signature #92]</h1> <p>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 06:46:27 UTC</p> Lisa Brookes, Isleofdogs, London, United Kingdom<p>overcrowed schools parking noise levels longer waiting times to see a doctor more street crime not enough police transport<br /> system would suffer</p> </article> <article> <h1>Andrey Ivanov [Signature #91]</h1> <p>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:20:04 UTC</p> Andrey Ivanov, London, Isle of Dog, United Kingdom<p>The local council must upgrade the infrastructure first</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #90]</h1> <p>Mon, 26 May 2014 01:52:07 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Helen Steadman [Signature #89]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 May 2014 01:34:02 UTC</p> Helen Steadman, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Kevin Bell [Signature #88]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 May 2014 03:33:39 UTC</p> Kevin Bell, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Lisa Golding [Signature #87]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 May 2014 01:21:49 UTC</p> Lisa Golding </article> <article> <h1>Caihong Li [Signature #86]</h1> <p>Sun, 11 May 2014 04:55:28 UTC</p> Caihong Li, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #85]</h1> <p>Sat, 10 May 2014 01:06:15 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #84]</h1> <p>Sat, 10 May 2014 01:05:54 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #83]</h1> <p>Sat, 10 May 2014 01:05:21 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #82]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 May 2014 08:30:42 UTC</p> Anonymous, 1 Pan Peninsula Square, London, United Kingdom<p>It is obvious to existing residents that these new developments will block light and, in the absence of preventative steps, be intrusive into older properties. It is also obvious that it will place great strain upon existing healthcare and road infrastructure.</p> <p>But the dangers are also more nuanced and must be addressed to win-over local residents: unless new bridges are built or old ones expanded, they will further crowd bridges into Canary Wharf; the developments do nothing to solve the lack of green spaces in the area (calling a strip of grass on the otherwise paved South Quay site "Pocket Park" doesn't count!); and Canary Wharf schools will remain without conveniently located schools.</p> <p>Why aren't developers being required to build new bridges to improve the accessibility of the Jubilee line and Crossrail? Why aren't they being asked to provide a nearby site to be used as a park, or to site a school that Canary Wharf residents and workers can actually use?</p> <p>These are the concerns of local residents, not whether or not ‘East End Life’ will turn-up this week.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Karl Hamilton [Signature #81]</h1> <p>Thu, 8 May 2014 05:22:21 UTC</p> Karl Hamilton, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Laura Gibbons [Signature #80]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 May 2014 01:43:14 UTC</p> Laura Gibbons </article> <article> <h1>Chris Hutchison [Signature #79]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 May 2014 01:42:20 UTC</p> Chris Hutchison </article> <article> <h1>Helen Gibbons [Signature #78]</h1> <p>Tue, 6 May 2014 01:41:24 UTC</p> Helen Gibbons </article> <article> <h1>Raymond Lee [Signature #77]</h1> <p>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 01:16:54 UTC</p> Raymond Lee, London, London, United Kingdom<p>I feel there are too many developments around South Quay. It will be so congested with the amount of residential tower blocks and offices being approved without proper planning and consultation with the residents who are living around here.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Thomas Zueger [Signature #76]</h1> <p>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:39:22 UTC</p> Thomas Zueger, London </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #75]</h1> <p>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 03:42:03 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Catherine Dean [Signature #74]</h1> <p>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:40:06 UTC</p> Catherine Dean </article> <article> <h1>Abhijay Jain [Signature #73]</h1> <p>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:31:13 UTC</p> Abhijay Jain, United Kingdom<p>The development is now getting unchecked - we really need some balance here</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #72]</h1> <p>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 04:29:15 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>I have been living in Tower Hamlets for 6 years. Despite numerous attempts with the council, there are high towers coming here thick and fast.</p> <p>A park (near Heron Quay DLR) was made before the Olympics. People walked through it, old people sat on the benches, it was very nice. Next thing we know, its getting uprooted. For another high rise. Before you have another high rise coming, I would like the council to sit back and think what the residents actually want here.</p> <p>I pay council tax and I am a good citizen. But I don't have the facilities that I expect from a developed country!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Susan Gibbons [Signature #71]</h1> <p>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:19:45 UTC</p> Susan Gibbons </article> <article> <h1>Laura Tirados-Menendez [Signature #70]</h1> <p>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 05:50:33 UTC</p> Laura Tirados-Menendez, LONDON, London, United Kingdom<p>I would appreciate if you could develop more green areas.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Kelly Gemmell [Signature #69]</h1> <p>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:04:56 UTC</p> Kelly Gemmell, London, London, United Kingdom<p>The doctors surgeries, local football courts, DLR, buses etc are all regularly full. Building thousands of new homes without careful planning and investment in infrastructure is not rational.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #68]</h1> <p>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 03:50:56 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #67]</h1> <p>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 03:49:51 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Daniel Hall [Signature #66]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:59:00 UTC</p> Daniel Hall, London, --, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Andy Leeser [Signature #65]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:42:35 UTC</p> Andy Leeser, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>susan lilja [Signature #64]</h1> <p>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:20:48 UTC</p> susan lilja, London, United Kingdom<p>I do not believe that the decisions taken by the labour councillors are good for the local community.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Steven James [Signature #63]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 04:51:09 UTC</p> Steven James, United Kingdom<p>The local Labour Party sees Canary Wharf as an easy target for reaching its housing targets. These (often ugly) developments will turn Canary Wharf into even more of a wind tunnel, and ruin the quality of life for existing residents. It is chronic and unnecessary overdevelopment.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #62]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 04:24:13 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #61]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:41:57 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Saul Duke [Signature #60]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:20:09 UTC</p> Saul Duke </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #59]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:14:13 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #58]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:42:57 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #57]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:22:12 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #56]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 06:12:58 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #55]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 06:03:42 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>Doctor's, Schools and DLR are already creaking so I am opposed to this without proper public consultation and proof of how infrastructure will cope.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #54]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 05:59:07 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom<p>I am strongly opposed; the DLR is already at capacity in the mornings on the commute from South Quay to Bank. The infrastructure as it stands certainly cannot cope with further property development.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Jeff Turner [Signature #53]</h1> <p>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 03:08:43 UTC</p> Jeff Turner, London, United Kingdom<p>Far too many new residential properties being built on the Isle of Dogs without the basic infrastructure and open spaces!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Holger Wessling [Signature #52]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:03:57 UTC</p> Holger Wessling, London, United Kingdom<p>There already is significant over-development. The Isle of Dogs urgently requires sustainable development, better involvement of the local community as well as much improved infrastructure (schooling, medical, transport, parks, sports, etc.).</p> <p>STOP the nonsense now !!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #51]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:03:09 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #50]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 02:56:47 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Shelley Watts [Signature #49]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 01:05:04 UTC</p> Shelley Watts, London </article> <article> <h1>Simon Ward [Signature #48]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:43:46 UTC</p> Simon Ward, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>michelle weeks [Signature #47]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:32:10 UTC</p> michelle weeks, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Alexandria Owen [Signature #46]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 09:27:22 UTC</p> Alexandria Owen </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #45]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 05:39:26 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #44]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 05:20:24 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>arkam alshaikhly [Signature #43]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:40:03 UTC</p> arkam alshaikhly, london, london, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Nicolas Deslandes [Signature #42]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 05:34:12 UTC</p> Nicolas Deslandes </article> <article> <h1>Sue Teh [Signature #41]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 04:57:34 UTC</p> Sue Teh, London, England, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Xavier Lo [Signature #40]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:24:03 UTC</p> Xavier Lo, United Kingdom<p>Please do not overcrowd Canary Wharf with unnecessary residential development. There simply is no need, and will disturb current residents massively.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #39]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 06:01:08 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Rajesh Angadala [Signature #38]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 05:59:28 UTC</p> Rajesh Angadala, London, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #37]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 04:05:25 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Photis Patsalides [Signature #36]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:08:46 UTC</p> Photis Patsalides </article> <article> <h1>Fiona Tranter [Signature #35]</h1> <p>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:06:33 UTC</p> Fiona Tranter<p>We are fast running out of schools, roads,doctors surgeries and green space. Our sense of community is being destroyed.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Adam Fung [Signature #34]</h1> <p>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 06:25:15 UTC</p> Adam Fung<p>With the reckless approval of monster residential high rise, the council has not thought about the pressure these proposal has on current infrastructure and living quality. It is shocking how disconnect the mayor and council are with the society</p> </article> <article> <h1>Alex Stevens [Signature #33]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Apr 2014 02:06:05 UTC</p> Alex Stevens </article> <article> <h1>Nikolaos Pappas [Signature #32]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Apr 2014 01:42:29 UTC</p> Nikolaos Pappas, London<p>The Tower Hamlets Council should recognize and appreciate the serious fact that this area can not cope any more with the increased development of enormous residential buildings and skyscrapers. The existing infrastructure has already become very weak. Neuralgic roads such as Marsh Wall and Westferry Road are now over congested at most times, local buses are overcrowded and medical surgeries can not cope with the increased number of residents. Noise pollution, increased exhaust emissions, delays on local journeys, long queues at local NHS centres are some indicative consequences of the overdevelopment and subsequent overpopulation in our area. In addition, protected areas such as the historic West India Docks and Millwall as well as protected views to Greenwich are seriously affected and this part of the borough is losing its unique historic character and value. Any sort of brownfield land and vacant sites are now being transformed into enormous skyscrapers but in the meantime there is absolutely no provision for the development of new parks, green infrastructure and play spaces in this particular part of the Borough. The residents quality of life is being continually downgraded.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #31]</h1> <p>Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:22:45 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #30]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:28:03 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Rebecca Duncan [Signature #29]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 03:11:33 UTC</p> Rebecca Duncan </article> <article> <h1>Souzie Holmes [Signature #28]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 01:22:08 UTC</p> Souzie Holmes, London, United Kingdom<p>The present infrastructure cannot sustain the new development.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #27]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 01:20:07 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #26]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:31:15 UTC</p> Anonymous, London </article> <article> <h1>Haroldas Dovydovas [Signature #25]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:28:16 UTC</p> Haroldas Dovydovas, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Raymond Pang [Signature #24]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:02:24 UTC</p> Raymond Pang, United Kingdom<p>The fact is that the Isle of Dogs is becoming overdeveloped and the resources are not sustainable.<br /> Supply is more than likely going to outstrip demand, having a detrimental effect on the existing residents.<br /> There should be more transparency in relation to the approval process by the Tower Hamlets council, as there does not appear to be any structure, and also feedback from residents are clearly being ignored.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Monsur Ahmed [Signature #23]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:49:02 UTC</p> Monsur Ahmed, London, United Kingdom<p>For years to come.<br /> Noise.<br /> Dirt.<br /> Grime.<br /> Publc transport disruption.<br /> Pathways closed.<br /> Safety concerns.<br /> Lack of infrastructure around Docklands to sustain such large amounts of deveopment.<br /> Blocking of natural light.<br /> The high intensity, close proximity build of all the developments.<br /> These are just some of my concerns regarding the developments being porpurted around the isle of dogs.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ankita V [Signature #22]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:21:20 UTC</p> Ankita V </article> <article> <h1>Xavier Lo [Signature #21]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 07:48:25 UTC</p> Xavier Lo, United Kingdom<p>Please do not overbuild properties in the Canary Wharf area!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Lena Thakkar [Signature #20]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:57:13 UTC</p> Lena Thakkar, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Paraag Amin [Signature #19]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:56:32 UTC</p> Paraag Amin, London, United Kingdom<p>Stop the development - there is massive overdevelopment of the area - too much!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Jonathan Martin [Signature #18]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 05:43:53 UTC</p> Jonathan Martin, London, United Kingdom<p>We do not have the infrastructure in the area for such a high concentration of residential buildings.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Sarah Burrell [Signature #17]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 05:34:06 UTC</p> Sarah Burrell </article> <article> <h1>Ronnie McBryde [Signature #16]</h1> <p>Mon, 7 Apr 2014 04:37:34 UTC</p> Ronnie McBryde, Isle of Dogs, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Leo Oon [Signature #15]</h1> <p>Wed, 2 Apr 2014 03:18:22 UTC</p> Leo Oon, London<p>There are already signs of overcrowding in these areas so by adding more tall buildings and properties could put pressure on public services and infrastructure like DLR, clinic, school etc to a tipping point, this could have serious implication on health and environment problem.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Yuliana Protasova [Signature #14]</h1> <p>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:21:39 UTC</p> Yuliana Protasova, United Kingdom<p>There is too many buildings in the area, which are far too close to each other, I now can watch a TV from my window in the block next door (Discovery dock building), and another building will be even closer to me, if build. There is no schools, nursery or kindergartens or parks available in the area at all. It is very big shortage and they are demolishing the ones, which left. Also there too many too heavy tall buildings on one square meter, the ground can easily collapse.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #13]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 03:38:30 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #12]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 02:17:51 UTC</p> Anonymous, London, UK, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Sonsoles Blanco [Signature #11]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:46:11 UTC</p> Sonsoles Blanco, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>YUNUS KAYA [Signature #10]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:02:05 UTC</p> YUNUS KAYA, United Kingdom<p>There are too many buildings getting built, we need to see projects of schools for the children as at this rate the existing will not be sufficient to support this growth. We also need to see what the community thinks in general as to these plans before new, substantially large buildings are built.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Abhishek Khandelwal [Signature #9]</h1> <p>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:48:55 UTC</p> Abhishek Khandelwal </article> <article> <h1>Simon Pascoe [Signature #8]</h1> <p>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:02:40 UTC</p> Simon Pascoe, London, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>David Jiang [Signature #7]</h1> <p>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 05:30:44 UTC</p> David Jiang </article> <article> <h1>Dhvani Gupta [Signature #6]</h1> <p>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 04:26:04 UTC</p> Dhvani Gupta, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #5]</h1> <p>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:29:31 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>john giblin [Signature #4]</h1> <p>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:21:47 UTC</p> john giblin, london, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Jahran Allen-Thompson [Signature #3]</h1> <p>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 03:07:18 UTC</p> Jahran Allen-Thompson </article> <article> <h1>Kian Kwa [Signature #2]</h1> <p>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 03:05:45 UTC</p> Kian Kwa, London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Colette Marsden [Signature #1]</h1> <p>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:28:02 UTC</p> Colette Marsden </article> </main></body></html>